Banter and General Comments, page-17671

I was simply commenting on his incorrect views of such a huge divergence between the 2 stocks. The factual divergence and subsequent convergence is much less on any chart longer than a 3 month period. By showing the most favourable timeline and totally ignoring the rest which shows less divergence, i would call it the wrong approach which i did. This can also be reasonably conceived to be a bit of a ramp as the suggested divergence is factually much less in reality. Nothing wrong with pointing that out.

I agree there will be convergence In the immediate future, just not anything like what is reflected on the 3 month timeline which is the point u keep missing. What i dont understand is that u also posted a chart showing less divergence than his but somehow u r willing to see past that and keep calling me out and dragging this on.