OK so on closer inspection - Day 4 which is the one they have picked out to give 1.5 log IS approx 1.5 log better than the control, approx 5.5 low dose R529 vs 6.75 saline (such a cr*p scale) BUT on day 6 there is very little difference between low dose R529 & Saline.
Strange as from the rubbish colouring on the chart/graph, it looks like R327 had a better kill on day 4 than R529 ?
Probably why they have NOT included statistical analysis.
This looks like a rushed ann of poor results to me - unfortunate.
Ann: Positive Intranasal Animal Data against SARS-CoV-2 in Study, page-23
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
30.0¢ |
Change
-0.010(3.23%) |
Mkt cap ! $86.51M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 30.5¢ | 32.0¢ | 29.5¢ | $30.79K | 100.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 17841 | 30.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 31.0¢ | 4109 | 8 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.34pm 26/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RCE (ASX) Chart |