Only as a result of your twisted interpretation is there an inference. You've appended a meaning that does not exist accept the space between your ears.
How simple is the statement "had access to"... and the subsequent intent to make a determination now they have access. Should ISX now write a short story to make it clear for those with the inability to understand statement simplicity??
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- Does the ASX have any option but fight in court?
Does the ASX have any option but fight in court?, page-138
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)