Why was it suspicious and what's the evidence? Trump was portraying run of the mill electoral procedures as suspicious, preying on people not smart enough who might believe him.
Trump was saying weeks before the election if he lost it's because they rigged it. What evidence did he have then? That's a narcissist protecting his own pride... who then proceeded to cherry pick little bits of info to make up every rumour under the sun as an excuse to why he lost - just to fit his own pre-made up conclusions. Conspiracy theorists operate like that. It's the reverse of scientific method.
Primary school children do that sort of thing. Anyone who could possibly buy into that rubbish with no basis in fact after 61 court cases have been thrown out is seriously warped. The only hard evidence of cheating is him calling officials to try to pressure them into "finding votes," another potentially criminal act to add to the list.
- Forums
- World Politics
- breaking : loser trump impeached twice first time in history
breaking : loser trump impeached twice first time in history, page-173
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, MD & CEO
Anthony Noble
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online