No Peer Reviewed Evidence for Climate Science, page-79

  1. 32,245 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 250
    If it is so grave why are the big emitters given a free pass?

    Why is it that we (Australia) have to commit to reducing our piddling amounts of emissions when the big emitters can lollygag for another 30 odd years?

    If you remember the hole in the ozone layer caused by those nasty aerosols, all countries discontinued using them very quickly as it was a clear and present danger to all.
    The science was solid and all of the countries that produced it shut down its use in short order.
    If the claims of MMCO2 tipping point to oblivion were true you would see China, India, Russia and the USA going balls and all to rectify this imbalance and not saying that we will commit in 2050 or we will add our military emissions to the count.

    I would suggest you lay off the sugary drinks and the spin at your tuck shop, make use of the ablution blocks before you follow through in your shorts and research the difference between theoretical science and scientific facts.


 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.