That we have the technology to measure some of these things better than we did 20-50 years ago?
As for the abilities of our esteemed scientific community to prove that MMCO2 is the only/main cause for these readings, it may possibly be another factor that is causing these issues or even if these issues are outside the natural fluctuations. I don’t know?
Believing, like you do, doesn’t make it scientific fact.
Closing off all other possibilities, shutting down debate because a larger percentage of scientists have hitched their wagons to this one potential reason based on modelling doesn’t make it a Fact. Not if one is using the term Scientific Fact in its true meaning.
Stifling debate in science is to disregard the essence of the scientific process, our great Australian Tim the man is a prime example. He believed the science was all down pat a while back and thought it safe to make his claims and we saw how that worked out.
Your monologue approach is comical to say the least or truely ignorant to the reality that even our smartest people are still trying to work it out.
