If you consider the fact that you and your friends continually point out that many of those big names in those industries have put in place plans to reduce their exposure to ff and increase their renewables I find your references a bit baffling?
Is BHP reducing or increasing their coal plays, is the oil & gas industry not working out cheaper production numbers using technologies designed to reduce emissions?
Your post is a perfect example of how AGW theory accepts no discourse, you name a Danish bloke, make vague references to the opportunity of climate scientists prostituting themselves to SKY news but do you really think/can you name any credible institutes that put proper money into research that may be detrimental to the cause?
It seem you place your scientists on a pedestal and above the normal human afflictions that us mortals cannot dodge.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- CO2 smashing extreme weather records
CO2 smashing extreme weather records, page-6746
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 181 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)