Nice Run, But Why?, page-77

Hello chilly. All power to them, they are all trying to save lives,no? But as far as deciphering where they are actually at, the webpage shows no news of the breath test, how it is implemented, or preliminary data on any breath/covid results. Perhaps tomorrow it'll be up. If ive missed something then feel free to provide addendum.

This news drop annoyed me , only because if ADO had done this theyd be figuratively drawn and quartered.
'As we continue our important work to re-purpose our breakthrough technology to help fight the COVID-19 crisis, we’re pleased to share this thorough and positive review of the ETD-100 inorganic explosives trace detector produced by the US National Institute of Standards.

Start a sentence with covid- finish it talking about the device they are repurposing on the basis of its inorganic explosives credentials.

From todays news article , as per the ceo in an article.(my queries in brackets).
'This is still all laboratory testing, but the results are extremely promising. (Care to share?)The next phase for us is commercialisation and mass manufacture(still lab testing ? ramped up testing?) We are doing the rounds, seeking government funding to help expedite the mass manufacture.(to test more or for saleable product?)”

All 1 week post ellume.

Rapid testing measurement/marketing in general is fraught with shifting goalposts.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32635-0/fulltext

When reviewing usability of a possibly less sensitive less invasive test vs a highly sensitive more invasive test.......the risk is 2 weeks in quarantine, ie these tests need to be better than good imo.