@tsibis is correct to make the point regarding the PFS - it would be exceptional for a PFS to consider 'shifts' the way you suggest it does and include them in the calculations as a fundamental assumption without ever mentioning it. The company did not clarify this in the updated PFS or any official communication in the past few years, including even interviews (to my knowledge).
Given that the market primarily values us based on the standard, common interpretation of the PFS, it would be a capital mistake to not be very clear about this fact (and to do the PFS the way you suggest it was done in the first place). I can't believe this would happen.
I don't doubt that what you say is true in every detail, but it's also not substantial enough to not dismiss it. People can misspoke and misunderstand things, and it gets more distorted every time it is repeated.
Now, if you're factually correct, at this point that's practically gross misconduct by the BOD as a whole.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EMH
- 2021 - The Year for EMH
2021 - The Year for EMH, page-257
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,242 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add EMH (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
15.5¢ |
Change
0.005(3.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $32.15M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
15.0¢ | 16.0¢ | 15.0¢ | $5.21K | 33.63K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 93170 | 15.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
15.5¢ | 91015 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 93170 | 0.150 |
1 | 20689 | 0.145 |
4 | 37142 | 0.140 |
3 | 157414 | 0.135 |
1 | 30000 | 0.130 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.155 | 91015 | 1 |
0.165 | 25000 | 1 |
0.180 | 16666 | 1 |
0.185 | 100000 | 1 |
0.200 | 16998 | 1 |
Last trade - 15.28pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
EMH (ASX) Chart |