2021 - The Year for EMH, page-264

Because the average institutional or private investor carefully evaluates differences in regional employment and environmental laws and regulations and doesn't just compare oranges to apples assuming that a PFS ANN-ed to ASX is roughly normalized with anything special highlighted somewhere? Or what was supposed to be your point?

As usual, without any source, you speculate a ridiculous reason to explain why it's not BS and delegate the job to prove the inverse position. Very comfortable, but also just makes me smile.
Point to any substantial legal or other requirement that tells a mining company to do a PFS in a way specific to the Czech Republic, assume just one shift, and be quiet about this in all written documents. Good luck.