Is this cryolite acquisition a sound investment or a mistake?

Not sure your motive with your first two posts being defamatory. But I can see you have cut and pasted this response from a pdf document judging by the odd spacing. And you appear or the author appears to have no problem spelling the Greenland political parties - I therefore conclude you are a male academic, and living outside of Australia, and Danish speaker.

Good day to you; but I think taking pot shots at Greg Barnes is unwarranted, and unnecessary. You may wish to consider protesting the recent Rio Tinto dynamite of ancient cave.

Through my research back to 1854, I have found 0 [zero] information on uranium ever being mentioned at this mine, or near it. In fact, it is for this reason I have invested in EPM as my research has shown that Greenland and it people have clearly not reached a consensus that uranium should be mined. This decision is the strategic decision for Greenland and its people. I respect that.

I also respect the historical value of this mine and what it did for the world we know. It is for this reason I invested in this mine, it is for this reason I have already written about the need to respect and honour this history of this mine and the seamen that lost their lives brining Cryolite to the world. it is for this reason I again hope that mining this brown field site can once more being added value to the local community for another one hundred years like Cryolite did.

Finally, I agree with you. Uranium has no consensus within Greenland to be mined. perhaps one day it will when people realise that the only way to reduce CO2 by 100%, whilst charging a fleet of EVs every night can only be achieved by nuclear energy.

Thanks for your comment, I look forward to your counter argument.