"They both turned up there.... PISSED". That's the opinion of a long ago retired person posting out of Snowtown who was no where near Parliament at the time alleged.
So,...Really? Were they? Your evidence of which is???????????????? Thought so, hearsay. But if you are correct you have just given the Courts a reason to discount any claims between the two. According to you they both turned up.... PISSED. Bet the alleged victim and alleged accused can rely on you to give evidence.
Stop posting your biased opinions as fact, do as Eagle does, work out of Sussex St and get the support and research required and provided by the senior spammers to put up valid arguments.
Kathy wasn't pissed and she has a solid memory, so where are we heading here? That's right, according to you LWNJ's any allegations about a MHR needs to be investigation by a Parliamentary Committee, whether or not said alleged conduct occurred whilst sitting in Parliament or long ago when one was attending High School or Uni. So.............. if it's good enough for Porter it's good enough for the guy who complained about a cold pie.
