What's up with the Appstablishment Website, page-9

I reckon it could all make sense if they were following the traditional lines of a ' Mandatory Blackout period that would apply to a say ' Target ' Company. A company who doesn't wan't there website scrutinized by unqualified public opinions whilst the Independent Experts report is just about to land for Shareholders to review ahead of a vote.

If you think of their website as a de facto ' Data Room ' , in a normal merger / acquisition transaction , this would not be open and available to the general public. So they may not want Investors to be misunderstanding the remaining products and their inherent place in the transaction.

In addition to that , another reason may be that if the acquisition is in part via an asset transfer , some assets of Appstablishment may or may not be removed or disposed of as not being integral to the transaction. So th

Often there are assets that the Acquirer would rather disposed of prior to completion of the transaction. Similarly , the owners of the Target for tax purposes may also want these assets disposed of prior to completing the transaction....and to me some of these look to be in the nature of ' Redundant ' IP. Of course this is only my opinion. But I would say my opinion is most likely more correct than the straight up jumping at shadows and calling foul play.