Ann: ASIC v ISIGNTHIS LTD & ANOR, page-69

LnW

Obviously that's not relevant now, although at some point it was discussed.

It has no bearing on the reason escrow hasn't been granted today though based on Monday's court case.

You making out this is still current. It's not as stated in my previous post.

Work with the here and now, not something historic way way back that's no longer applicable and obviously was resolved.

All the terms required for escrow were met by isx as discussed in Monday's court proceedings. No amendments were discussed. Cheers

.