This is INCORRECT .
RMS calculated resource at Tampia on different block sizes to EXU ,much larger minimum mining width and unlike EXU WITH a topcut .
Apart from these and other parameters changed RMS used a more conservative estimation technique at times involving inverse distance Kriging which EXU of course did not and as I understand should've , like the top cut and probably the min. mining width .
Let's face it , EXU had a vested interest in talking it up !
The grade was comparable but slightly lower than EXU calculated and if haulage was the big reason you would've expected a higher grade than EXU .
Clearly , whichever calculation you favor , these differences were the reason for the reduced resource not haulage .
Can see that RMS could well have been conservative in their estimate , as is their habit but there is a difference between THAT and deliberately understating .
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RMS
- What’s happening at Tampia
RMS
ramelius resources limited
Add to My Watchlist
0.00%
!
$3.50

What’s happening at Tampia, page-463
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
$3.50 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.698B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$3.53 | $3.53 | $3.44 | $48.95M | 13.98M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 5150 | $3.50 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$3.52 | 90000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 60 | 3.780 |
1 | 6000 | 3.700 |
1 | 83 | 3.670 |
3 | 8173 | 3.560 |
1 | 143 | 3.520 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.220 | 917 | 1 |
3.290 | 6306 | 2 |
3.330 | 1469 | 1 |
3.350 | 1679 | 1 |
3.450 | 8000 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.13pm 18/09/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RMS (ASX) Chart |