Ann: Suspension from Official Quotation , page-31

During the debate in Country Things autumn session in 2008 on Landssytre's Uranium Statement was a large majority agreed to introduce an upper limit for the content of uranium in mineral raw materials. A large majority also felt that the planning for the extraction of mineral raw materials obviously must be given weight and the environment, health and assessment of pollution hazards.
The introduction of an upper limit for the content of uranium raw materials will have less impact on how close the mine which is inhabited places, fjords, etc. if we use high standards as the basis for mining, we will provide a unique idea is adapted all.
A total Landsting agree that there must be extracted uranium. There is a consensus to minedrif-ten to be developed. A majority of Landsting want an upper limit of the levels of uranium in mineral raw materials. It's about rare earths in Kuannersuaq (kvanefjeldet) which are economically interesting santé.
Siumut believe that local people must be involved as much as possible in connection with the planning of mining operations in this way we ensure a feeling of security in the local population and ensure that they are part of the process, and directly influenced the establishment of mining operations.
All mineral resources in Greenland has more or less content of uranium. Gold in guldminepro project in Nuuk fjord, the higher content of uranium than the mineral resources found in Kuan-suaq (Kvanefjeldet) in Narsaq.
So I ask, with the bases Landsstyre member of Raw materials Karl Ove Berthelsen on behalf of the government come up with such statements? And he looks like the second mining established until there is a decided upper limit for the content of uranium in minerals from the Greenlandic underground. What background, such a statement?
Aleqa Hammond
President Siumut