nice buy, page-7

Absolutely, i have noticed it on dozens of occasions, no exaggeration.

The key insight is -
Why bag MAE out NOW when they just bought cheap shares? (The bagging-out-rumourtrage-to-create-a-false-problem-and-to-evoke-some-panic/disappointment tactic was obviously only useful for last weeks plan top assist in creating cheaper shares)

I have a good reason to beleive that those responsible might live to regret it if it is looked into more closely by an authority, and i beleive it is, as it should be.
I wouldnt even doubt that the company has ample reason to protect its information from these types and contributes as to why we only read ASX announcements at the eleventh hour or owhen imperative/compulsory.
Its a real problem and it has cost shareholders so much money in the last 2 yrs...I can count and detail 5 rumours/fibs and the players that have created substantial falls for us in the that time.

Its all about our company and how its value is sometimes created, inflated and deflated and it all amounts therefore to our money and our investment being manipulateable. So i feel its only fair that we should be abnle to write about it (rumourtrage), seeing as it has such a gravitational effect on our money. Its an unneccessary and an introduced risk that is not associated with our fundamentals nor corporate discourse and it is therfore not above the belt.

So its a releif to read now other people have made similar observations and how there is now wave of diligence and vigilance spreading through our posters on the MAE threads. Some have deliberately ambiguous posts, others are clear and transparent - having the wisdom to know the difference requires Sevant=like insight sometimes.

Cheers,

L