brave souls rewarded today, page-44

Okay so he has said literally nothing of substance... Love the continuing fall-back on "I've tried to keep this high level as I'm unsure how many people here understand the technology". I don't think it's really fooling anyone though.

Also lol @ this poor attempt at addressing Zenox's question re APX's ability to provide unbiased data: "Overcoming bias in AI & ML is a really interesting area of research. From a workforce perspective (or the product line I mentioned in an earlier post) in order to achieve economies of scale, processes become streamlined and quality workers are retained. The value of human-assistance in this balance with machine is something that's going to become incredibly important in the future. However the more we automate, the more apparent the bias we introduce becomes."

Basically "yeah it's really interesting and important... and there's a trade-off between automation and bias". This doesn't sound like someone who knows anything about bias in AI at all... Also love that it's gone from "I have a lot of experience in the industry" to now banging on about "studying at Ivy League universities". Someone is really desperate to convince us that we're dealing with a real expert!

I honestly don't get why people bother to do this - does this guy think that people on HC are moving the share price of a $1.7bn company? How dumb.

I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt mate, but you're not fooling anyone. Every time you get pressed for specifics, you move on to high-level generic criticisms that have been made for months (and largely debunked) about (1) Appen being a glorified labour hire company; (2) data labelling becoming increasingly irrelevant; and/or (3) China taking Appen's IP. If you knew what you were talking about, we've given you countless opportunities to say something even remotely insightful...