The licence may forbid Biota from spreading information but shareholders and individuals (possibly even employees posting as informed individuals)can.
My aim is to help Biota and encourage an awareness of zanamivir, it's possible if you think beyond making money, and controlling debate.
""Limited evidence to date suggests that oseltamivir is not a major teratogen in humans. Because more data concerning the safety of use during pregnancy are available for oseltamivir vs zanamivir, use of oseltamivir in pregnant women is preferred vs use of zanamivir."
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/704737
Revere,
I couldn't understand the relationship of Relenza with Tamiflu, it clarified things for me, I'm hoping it's useful.
If Relenza concentration beyond the lungs is delayed and therefore low and ineffective for systemic infection ,wouldn't the placenta multiply the concentration reduction for a placenta?
(sarcasm)Perhaps when GSK has a moment away from vaccine research.......?.(/sarcasm)
Posted by: miso | July 8, 2009 9:15 AM"
http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2009/07/swine_flu_and_the_prenatal_cli.php#comments
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BTA
- shareholder rights
shareholder rights
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)