Thanks for tagging me my friend - not only once, twice. Thanks again
Water treatment with this type of technology is not cost effective
First, machines must be reliable (I am talking from my experience treating water for consumptionusing high end tech), which means maintenance is a good source of income. After 2 years, owners will discover that this is easy to maintain and it will not be a regular income
Second point: Treatment is limited to the capacify of the tank... when you have a room and you pretend to disinfect it using a gas, the room is the container. In this case, you need a contact tower (made of stainless steel, otherwise it will oxidise).
- Do we have this kind of capacity?
Third point: There are more traditionals alternatives which are cost effective. Only good point here is to sell this a a 'green-tech' which is not (we need a lot of energy)....
- Do we have the alternative to source this machine using renewable energy?
Kind regards
Your friend, Maxlots
'Tech expert' - based on Tukebay opinion
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PO3
- Ann: R&D Heads of Agreement with Osmoflo
Ann: R&D Heads of Agreement with Osmoflo, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PO3 (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
22.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.078M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
PO3 (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable