Ann: Clarification and Retraction of Media Release, page-16

  1. 3,899 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1273
    "This has not yet been assessed by an independent third party."
    Oh, isn't that a vital part of the retraction???
    AS, writer of over 100 patents & Mr. Nanosonics, is behind the new application of the tech & you doubt him because of a media release?
    You should send a written apology to him!

    "Now the company itself is admitting it will need capital for this."
    I didn't need the company to admit this, nor should anyone else if they can read a financial statement or see that the company's controlling shareholder has advanced funds (yet again) - it's at what price that CR will be held.
    You think 40c, I think $4.
    Perhaps it'll be somewhere in between.
    If they keep signing companies like Aspen & Osmoflo, it may even be at prices higher than $4.
    Who knows?

    "There are a few people that have been trying to warn people about this being a poor investment, but of course we always get some company shills that don't want real investors to understand what is going on."
    And there are a few bitter former investors who claim to know more about the company & its tech than those truly credentialed to know about it.
    And please provide your definition of a "real investor".
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.