@GregLPeters
Your a poster with a few weeks on the forum, yet behave as if you've been here for years.
Here is a simple question for you..
Does the company state that the FRG unit produces ozone in ambient air?? Yes or No??
Does the company claim it produces anything else in ambient air?? If yes then provide a link please.
In moist air it produces Hydroxyl radicals as well. Who has moist air in indoor spaces?? (the patent also states creates some ozone in 100% saturated air, on their website).
So for all purposes in ambient air, which is where people use air purifiers it is for all intents and purposes an ozone generator. For Osmoflo with water applications, it will also be competing against existing ozone and hydroxyl generators on the market, so huge sales against established competition shouldn't be expected, unless Independent labs run tests compared to this competition and it shows outstandingly better performance in terms of efficiency, longevity, cost and effectiveness. Not even the company has run these tests yet.
Air purifiers, a mass market, was meant to be the biggie, yet the company/tech was rejected by an OEM (so far unnamed), and only has a possibility of some relatively minor other uses with these 2 companies.
I'm sick and tired of company shills that keep trying to pump up something that simply doesn't deserve it. The Mcap of $62m is way out of kilter with what the company has done for the last decade and the tech license they hold.
It was only pumped up to high levels by BP buying in way above market and joining the board. The company spent his money, he left the BOD, so realistically the Mcap should be around the level it was prior to his involvement, as it was meant to be months away from sales 3 years ago.
With these 2 groups only running tests, it still could be a year or 2 away from sales, if they decide to use it!! If not, it is back to some other type of marketing..
@tukebay you keep using the phrase "unique and disruptive" to describe your belief in the tech, yet never have you stated exactly what is either unique or disruptive. There are already devices that create both ozone and hydroxyl free radicals on the market, so the FRG tech cannot be unique because of existing competitors in the market place.
What do you think it does that other existing units don't or can't do??
(20min delay)