Ann: Golden Swan Drilling Confirms High Grade Continuity, page-124

About right based on info to date.
Your "depth" is width - true width is emerging around 3.5m. Wider is always better (reduces development intensity)
Your "wide" is strike length. I read around 50 - 60 metres too. A bit shorter than the SS lenses - if this strike length becomes the average length, then GS will be quite development intensive (ie high access costs; low tonnes per vertical metre)
Your "long" is vertical height. Height gives you scheduling flexibility - ie you could have 2 mining areas in parallel production but strike length is short for stacked stoping areas- maybe ok for multiple cut and fill (not sure, too early). Have to be careful with geotech conditions when splitting height into multiple areas. Anyway, SS used under-hand cut and fill at around these depths I think to manage in situ and mining induced stresses. It's an expensive method - hopefully GS can use stoping.
Early days and not much info. Hope all dimensions increase as the assays roll in.
Cheers