You weren't correctly talking about Dan when you posted a link that dealt only with work place injury.
You weren't talking about Dan when you referenced casual workers.
And then you try to inference that I was suggesting ideas about Dans RTW in response to you irrelevant posts.
Well done finally on your third attempt presenting information directly relating to Dans case. Quite an achievement! Bravo.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- More on Andrews beating.
More on Andrews beating., page-664
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 140 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)