Serious saliva competition..., page-12

No, he doesn’t.
These people are false prophets.
There are plenty of competitors out there.
14 approved by TGA.
One UK company has 100% specificity and 98% sensitivity. It also has a rapid saliva test claimed to have 95% accuracy.
Did you know that? Did the good captain ever dig that up for everybody? If not, why not?
Quidel, 97% and 99% - the last I heard, they’re somewhat more established than we are.
Bio Note out of South Korea, 96% and 98%.
Abbott, USA, 93% and 99%.
There are a host of others in the high 80’s and mid 90’s, ALL with far more established networks and clout than our little baby that hasn’t even got TGA approval in its own country - for a test that is already bettered by others who do.
Didn’t know any of that, did you?
Be grateful, Pharvest, that this whiny prick keeps your bloody eyes open, even if it hurts your tender feelings. Because “super researchers” who cherry pick only the most gilded of info and extrapolate only positive conclusions will lead you to oblivion if they DON’T balance their findings with the ugly side! Do you really not understand that? Really?

PS…..

THIS is balanced research - someone whose own money is tied up in this stock, yet makes the downside publicly available for all to best judge their own investment.