Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Background story to CV19 / HCQ and IVM treatments, page-1034

First 1034 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Marketinfo

37,404 Posts.

245

24/07/21

09:33

Post #: 54738419
Share

Originally posted by rememdium: ↑

1. It's not a trial. These women voluntarily had the COVID vaccine
2. They used data from a "v-safe" vaccine health checker these women voluntarily opted to provide info
3. Of the 35 691 v-safe participants who were all pregnant. Pain at the injection site was the biggest reported problem, followed by headache, chills and fever though these were less common
4. The study identified similar adverse pregnancy incidences as comparable to those in pregnant women prior to COVID
5. The preliminary findings identified no obvious safety signals however they recommend further longitudinal studies

So what you imply is completely wrong to what they evidence suggests.

Expand

“1. It's not a trial. These women voluntarily had the COVID vaccine”

Since when has volunteering changed the nature of a trial?

You need to refer to a dictionary for the meaning of words.
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

LIS

'Opens doors': Li-S Energy the first Oz company to produce lithium metal foils

Week 28 Wrap: Tariff chaos back for some reason; CBA holds strong

HotCopper Highlights: RIP to Botanix (for now); Droneshield new ATH; Trigg mystery halt

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

ILU

Rare earths stocks surge as Pentagon buys big stake in US REE miner

AAU

Antilles brings Chinese ally on board to keep Neuva Sabana work chugging on

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

Trump just dropped a 200% tariff bomb. Here's how to cash in

VMM

'Big tick': Viridis positions for global leadership with Colossus pre-feasibility study

CWX

Carawine faces Fraser Range JV collapse as IGO moves to scrap partnership

First 1034 Last

SPONSORED BY