Not as strong as I was hoping, with the potentially economic assays not being as wide as the visual observations and the best intercept dominated by the 1m at 9%. But it looks like they're consistently getting 1%+ under this pod and they're interpreting hints of more at depth so it just might be better than they originally thought. Certainly plenty of reason to keep testing it out - and let's keep moving those drills out!!
Also it looks like their theory of the mineralisation extending beyond the dykes is getting support. What are the implications? Ie what is their model they believe is driving broader mineralisation here. They say structural but for what or how? I'd like to know what they're theorising as it presumably would indicate the direction of exploration.
CCZ Price at posting:
3.9¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)