pretty simple points are misinterpreted as usual, just like people believe a chain reaction is a diagnostic test.
gangeng 40% is at the project level not spinCo
don't assume ffx adds working capital to spinCo, ffx is contributing the entire project in exchange for 20% of spinCo, there is no obligation to add working capital
mikey has already stated in-specie distribution to ffx shareholders, that's the free shares, to say no distribution to shareholders is completely against the company narrative
the amazing points:
spot spodumene at record and gold up yet ffx closes down for the trading day (should be getting close to a turn upwards, no chartist is covering posting on ffx recently)
around 40,000,000,000 USD market cap company couldn't put in a few million for working capital and mikey couldn't get binding debt finance either to cover the full capex, mikey got an agreement from ganfeng to work with the company to try to get finance i.e. best efforts, nothing binding
if there were zero free shares, i.e. no distribution, no priority rights, and even no rights issue allocation available to retail, no working capital, no debt finance for spinCo, there would be no mutiny, no action whatsoever, we would all grumble but do nothing, as usual, just like the public always does, and everybody knows it
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FFX
- Lithium
Lithium, page-38
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 48 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add FFX (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online