Iron ore price, page-34684

It's a fair and good question, but I say it is not important.
Some call it a variety of blur hydrogen.

my thoughts

• Hydrogen is best as a storage of energy
• hydrogen is great for moving from low cost areas to high cost areas
• nuclear is best as a consistent steady baseload (imo)
• hydrogen creation is inefficient, so a waste of good base load if created with nuclear
  
• hydrogen should be created by the cheapest of electrical generation, perfect for taking peak load away from solar when it's not needed by the grid.
• solar power at midday is much much cheaper than nuclear
• Some hydrogen will be produced by nuclear for sure, but there will probably be rules in place to say it is not 100% green
• Studies show nuclear hydrogen has about the same cost base as renewable hydrogen
• Nuclear should be used to replace coal imo