MX,
That's the trouble with TA in isolation, it can easily give you gibberish. 67 isn't credible nearterm (except for some wildcard the chart simply can't know) and 18 isn't even plausible unless we have a GFC part II, even worst than the first - something the chart also can't know.
LOL.
EL
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PNA
- pna chart info please.
pna chart info please., page-35
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)