Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

NATURAL VS V INDUCED IMMUNITY, page-37

First 37 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
grindstone cowboy

21,231 Posts.

129

30/08/21

13:21

Post #: 55680278
Share

Originally posted by JonnoH: ↑

@batfink68

"First sentence says the two jab isn't as effective as natural immunity against the virus."

Only if you don't count the 4+ million unvaccinated dead people.

"Second sentence says that single jab patients gain additional protection if they were previously infected with the virus."So, if you were not one of the 4+million who died from their infection, it is worth getting a booster shot.

"Hmm, what springs to my mind first is that the corporations that make the vaccines are claiming not only do people require 2 jabs but, they require ongoing jabs, for as long as variants of the virus are going around. The paper isn't doctored data being paid for by those corporations."

The paper only says you get a benefit from a jab as well. It doesn't say anything about not getting any further benefit from further jabs. You may need 10 jabs to keep up your immunity.

"Astonishing contradictory findings that this paper puts forth, will shake those lemmings, who can't think for themselves and require the abc to tell them what to do and how to think."

Hardly!

Expand

the RWNJs know the car industry us a scam, the leftards are duped into maintenance, changing oil and filters every 6 months and timing belts, spark plugs every 100,000 k
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

PV1

Provaris tells ASX non-binding MOUs are still material to share prices in somewhat fiery compliance response

Exploring the causes and potential solutions to Australia's housing crisis

Revolutionary inverter technology leads the clean energy charge

From the Floor with Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton at Diggers & Dealers 2024

Emerald & Azure score Digger & Dealer awards

There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...

First 37 Last