Share
3,767 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 251
clock Created with Sketch.
02/09/21
18:56
Share
Originally posted by spiderman14:
↑
There is increasing evidence from many studies around the world (Kentucky USA study for one ) that once someone is infected with Covid and recovers they have the antibodies in their system that seem to recognise the Covid protein variants that are appearing and these antibodies are lasting longer and are more wide ranging than the synthetic specific to one variant antibodies that are injected through the vaccine. That being the case why are those that have recovered still required to be vaccinated when it's benefit is next to useless? A doctor George Mason professor of law in the USA has won a court case exempting him from the vaccine for this very reason. He recovered from Covid and his antibodies levels were higher after many months compared to the vaccinated but he was still required to be vaccinated to enter a university. Now such a precedent should be used here and should also be tested in court as there will be 100s of thousands if not millions who will have recovered and acquired natural antibodies as the years pass. Let's use some logic and common sense here.
Expand
Dude, this is common sense. Now, is common sense really common? You expect people that were lining up to inject an unknown poison in them - one that has no long term studies completed and without having gone through the safety protocols that every Safe and Effective Vaccine ever invented had to go through prior to release, you expect these same people to have the common sense to understand this? You have extremely high expectations