FGR have done there cement tests. Thomas Swan, Versarien and Applied Graphene are doing their own. To me implies they use a different graphene. Hence my connection that Thomas Swan clearly has a simple cheap way of making graphene (acknowledging that it is highly quality dependent on the source graphite.)
Yur question I was answering was " Is FGR developing their own IP rather than working with GEIC and the other industry partners?" I providing logical answer ...no. The others didn't offer any invitation. esp. if they use different graohene because all three parties want their graphene performance tested. Your question relies on assumption that the other three should use FGR graphene. Business is not a prayer meeting.
FGR Price at posting:
20.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
