TRY troy resources limited

Ann: Extension of Voluntary Suspension, page-40

  1. 1,538 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1134
    From an economic pov, yes. But Barrick has much higher opportunity costs. Spend management time on a 35k ozs per annum mine and lose elsewhere.
    They made it pretty clear they want to replicate their success in West Africa meaning 100-200k per annum mines, a thoroughly upgraded if not new plant. The plant must be located near the deposit.
    So I would argue 80% joint-venture expanded to all of Troy's tenements is the answer.

    As for Troy: ca. A$30m in deferred tax assets, half of it in Guyana. A$65m net cashflow from Smarts u/g. A$25m in trade credits. A$13m gold loan. A$57 when the dust has settled. Plus whatever upside there is at Smarts u/g - I think igrade will be higher and tonnage also when using a lower cut-off - and what they can get for the plant if they stop exploring.

    So in a perfect world Troy could end up with roughly A$100m in cash plus a plant to sell, a passive 20% stake in a Barrick mega-mine and a couple of royalties. But I could also envision a co-existence when someone is needed to mop up all the minor deposits that are near certain to turn up during exploration.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.