I do not need to demonstrate a 0.5% death risk from the vaccine to prove my statement.
That was a starting point to show the worst case for an entire population.
So moving along...
from an earlier post:
These are US stats.
The percentages are not % of cases
(as in breadwinner's insightful table above)
Here, u50's comprise 13.6% of Covid deaths.
We can also factor in a report that 94% of Covid deaths had co-morbidities...
https://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/cdc-94-of-covid-19-deaths-had-underlying-medical-conditions
So if we use our 0.5% as a base and then take 13.6% of that...
= 0.068%
Now taking the 6% of deaths that did NOT have co-morbidities (keeping in mind that's for ALL cases and so likely skews to older people) as a percentage of 0.068%...
= 0.0041% risk of death from Covid for <50's with no comorbidities.
(Not even factoring in fitness, either.
Just no significant underlying health conditions.)
Figures for Vaccine death rates and severe adverse reaction rates are varied & open to debate,
but a 1 in 400,000 risk lies somewhere between the risk of vaccine death and the risk of severe vaccine reactions.
And none of this takes into account any future unknown risks from vaccination.
As I said previously, a risk this low does not warrant taking any other risk to mitigate it.
- Forums
- General
- Covid - the Stats that Matter...
Covid - the Stats that Matter..., page-133
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 64 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan, Geologist - David Trabert
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan
Geologist - David Trabert
SPONSORED BY The Market Online