Morning all.
do we have any geologists here?
is their use of the very low cut off 0.26g/t legitimate, if they’re going to produce a concentrate?
I thought underground cut offs were normally 1, or more likely 2+ g/t. That would significantly reduce the amount of gold in our resource statement,
the good thing in this Ann is that the new area is consistent with what we already have and it’s all good for the concentrate strategy. This means quicker into production and at lower capex. Also avoids the no cyanide problem.
cheers,
ned.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
13.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(3.57%) |
Mkt cap ! $29.97M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 13.5¢ | 14.0¢ | 13.5¢ | $26.93K | 199.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13897 | 13.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0¢ | 251204 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.37pm 25/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MTC (ASX) Chart |