I'm with you gassy. I also don't see why someone with say Dr. Gittleson's high calibre would bother accepting the invitation to join the ANP board and accept the subsequent promotion to the board chair just to turn around and recommend a TO. She would have been well aware of any TO play when she was deciding on whether to join the board as it takes time for say Serepta to perform DD and negotiate an agreeable outcome. Just seems like a waste of her time and expertise.
Charmaine has stated in the ********* interview that she believes that the science has potential and worth exploring in terms of an indication and there is a community with an unmet need. These are some of the reasons she joined in the first place, not to simply help negotiate a TO which may also put her position at risk depending on what Serepta wants to do with ANP. Again, waste of her time IMO but this is all nothing more than speculation. as Sam says.. See how we go!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PER
- Who funds trial - poll
Who funds trial - poll, page-35
Featured News
Add PER (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
8.2¢ |
Change
0.002(2.50%) |
Mkt cap ! $73.92M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
8.0¢ | 8.2¢ | 7.9¢ | $16.80K | 210.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 24999 | 7.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
8.3¢ | 31992 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 24999 | 0.079 |
2 | 60000 | 0.078 |
2 | 114144 | 0.077 |
2 | 46800 | 0.075 |
1 | 100000 | 0.074 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.083 | 31992 | 1 |
0.084 | 100000 | 1 |
0.085 | 136669 | 3 |
0.086 | 33375 | 2 |
0.087 | 531562 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PER (ASX) Chart |