I used XYZ as a generic ticker in explaining the math behind an investment choice. I find math more useful than rocket emojis when making investment decisions, but each to their own I guess.
I used ticker "the other company that shall not be named" as a real world example to defend the argument that roll over opportunities aren't out there. Is it surprising that I used a company that I had researched and invested in because the metrics matched the math?
I used a Ford in the example. It doesn't mean I'm a Ford fan or salesman trying to get you to buy a new car. It was just an example that had the right metrics to back up the math. There's that magic word again, math.
I post bearish charts on stocks I hold, the same as I post bullish charts on stocks I don't hold, because I enjoy the TA side. And I will never belittle someone who sells a stock that I hold just for my own personal gain. I respect everyone's individual investment goals, and if I can provide some TA insight or alternative thinking/math to achieve that, then I will continue to do so.
I honestly hope that NXM hits the $1 Perdy retirement mark. Whether I'm on it or not is irrelevant as I retired a couple of years ago at age 42 with a guaranteed income for life that well and truly exceeds my living expenses and isn't tied to the stock market fluctuations. Last year was such a good year in the market that I withdrew all my original investment capital and am just reinvesting/trading profits now. I have achieved the epitome of not being emotionally invested in the market.
Finally, keep the twitter tips coming because you've thrown up some good ones of late.
GLTAH
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
