in-situ uranium experts appointed ..., page-13

The fact my last post was moderated I find completely incredulous.

I made it perfectly clear I was posting my point of view and not expressing that of the company. I have in fact given many reasons in the past for giving the same point of view. Is that not what this site is about, expressing a point of view?

A point of view I dare say has continually been justified by the advancement of PEN. Although not exactly as I had stated on occasions, definately advancing according to my positive outlook on PEN.

After the recent bout of posts here that were left in tact and were proven to be completely false, in fact some blatant lies, I simply cannot believe this post was moderated.

If the mods would like evidence of what I stated in regards to permitting, please feel free to contact me. That was a plain and simple fact and did not breach any aspect of HC requirements.

So someone thinks I am wrong on permitting? Good luck to you, you are about to learn what you don't know!

Good luck to you people. My time has come to go it alone, along with the few I choose to deal with offline.

Selamat tidur...