Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Today's Gestapo news, page-211

First 211 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
ramAustralia

23,582 Posts.

127

20/10/21

17:50

Post #: 56946420
Share

Originally posted by sierra: ↑

That doesn't make sense.

There are conditions that must be met before a mortgage goes into default and a set time before the holder of that mortgage can take possession after those conditions are met.

If he wasn't in default of the terms of the mortgage the mortgage holder couldn't have got a court to order the repossession. Even if he was in default and the bank took possession and disposed of the property there are conditions to meet to ensure it is sold fairly on the open market with provisions to allow work to be carried out to improve the salability.

After all that any amount above the debt and costs must be paid to the mortgagor by the mortgagee.

Finally if the mortgagor was willing and able to pay the mortgagee the debt owed before the court order was issued and their lawyer had it documented that the mortgagee refused to accept payment the court could never have issued that order.

That's my understanding as a mortgagee who was party to repossessing a property from a mortgagor who defaulted.

Expand

You are assuming a fully functional legal system. Crooks really don't care much about the law.
6 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

HRZ

Horizon firms up ore reserve for Boorara ahead of FY25 Q1 development decision

Nine staff strike as Paris Olympic coverage begins

ASX Market Open: ASX200 to rise for Friday session | July 26

MND

Monadelphous inks $200M contract with Woodside to help build Pluto LNG – but will it make Scarborough cheaper?

IGO

IGO kicks off earn-in copper drilling on-site Encounter's Yeneena play as it adopts new identity

There are more pages in this discussion • 699 more messages in this thread...

First 211 Last