The Shine case reads like a cut and paste of the SGH one, which was already a difficult to prove proposition based on recent precedents.
SGH was unable to find a third party litigation funder who wanted to touch this case, meaning they were fully exposed to the risks/costs if it failed.
What are the odds that they found another third-rate law firm to share the risk / reward with instead?
Ann: Media reporting regarding potential class action, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add A2M (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$6.64 |
Change
0.050(0.76%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.800B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $6.53 | $6.64 | $6.49 | $8.584M | 1.305M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3405 | $6.60 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $6.64 | 1766 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 27/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| A2M (ASX) Chart |