"The idea of Natural immunity is absurd in context of society, hospital capacity."
Ummm... what?
Do you understand the core concepts of the Great Barrington Declaration?
The basis is focussed protection of the vulnerable, and letting those at low risk get on with their lives. They will get it, with no/minor issues, and build natural immunity, and in turn, protect the overall population/vulnerable.
This approach was proposed by non-conflicted, non-captured, esteemed subject-matter experts, and supported by 10's of thousands of health professionals.
Remember, about 99.95% of people under 70yrs survive this.
Essentially ALL healthy Australians under 70 (very LOW risk) could have been "back to normal" early last year, with all of them now having natural immunity, without any disastrous impact on our hospitals. Ponder that, in the context of destroyed businesses, stripped livelihoods, mental health etc etc etc...
Your statement is nonsensical, as it effectively only considers the 2 extreme options put to you by the "eggspurts" on the TV.
But, hey, what would these people know??
Oh, and whatever happened to India?
Oh yeah, we all know what happened to India. Early, cheap, effective, available treatment with known-safe drugs. As supported by 60+ studies, including RCTs. But, you know, coz science, there's "not enough evidence" ...cough-cough-not-enough-money-to-be-made. SMH.
