Former weapons inspector: Iraq not a threat, page-8

  1. 29,310 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 80
    Hi adrock,

    "I cant believe people want more evidence of Saddam's guilt "..
    Guilt in relation to what?
    Is he any more a despot than the leaders of Iran, North Korea, Indonesia?
    Why is he alone being targeted?
    The Timor issue has been resolved, yet daily people are being killed in Aceh, Indonesia's westernmost province, and have been for over 11 years that I know of. I have not heard one word of outcry on this. Why? NO OIL.
    In Iran when the Shah was deposed and the Ayatollah's mad mullahs ruled the land with Kalashnikovs, who cared?
    Why not attack Mugabee?
    The fact that a leader is a dictator does not make him evil.
    Look at the mess in our own country at times. The elected government has to face attacks daily from the opposition, unions, etc, who do nothing constructive for the country , just try to bring down the said government.
    Look at Singapore and how it thrived under its benevolent dictator, Lee Kwan Yew. High standard of living, 0 unemployment, no strikes no crime , no pollution, no littering, no pornography.
    Methinks a dictator is not a bad idea. All those libertarians hell-bent on destroying familly values, sound social structures etc in the name of democracy would be "re-educated". The likes of Kevin Reynolds would be retrained as voluntary social workers (over a long period) LOL.
    Saddam has done nothing that other countries have not done.
    Why pick him?

    Regards
    GZ
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.