Ann: Quarterly Activities Report, page-56

My God, are you embarrassed and still dishonest!

The numbers were certainly not quite in line with expectations and expectations were higher, you have to admit that. The poor price performance in recent months has anticipated these expectations, as is common on the stock market. Prices of 1.50 AUD could still be achieved here, I don't want to rule that out. But if we look at the current valuation, which is currently only at AUD 250 MILLION, then that is again very, very cheap.

Incidentally, I had already suggested in July that I did not have high expectations for the first quarter of production.

But: So far, only 2 deliveries have been made and E25 recognized early on that the freight costs are too high. What did E25 do? E25 counteracted this in good time by transporting larger quantities (50,000 - 60,000 t) in the future - the next delivery will take place in November. So let's wait for the next 2-3 quarterly reports to get a final impression of whether the deal is worthwhile. It is obvious that something still needs to be improved and that is right to criticize. But I think, precisely because E25 is a young producer, that small problems are part of it.

It is only important that you recognize these problems in good time and draw the right conclusions from them - and I see that with E25 !!

Where is the problem?

rocket973: I like critical voices and also respect opposing opinions. But you are simply dishonest and have only one goal: to make E25 bad - and that at a rate of 0.10 AUD, where you were wrong several times! They also have no arguments, just cheap tricks!

I will remain fully invested here - after all, the future will be traded on disallowed and the future lies, among other things, quite simply with battery-powered manganese - and the E25 should still have a lot to offer in the future!

Many Grettings from Germany!