Best Battery in the World, page-34

As a new poster and both a PPK and LIS shareholder ( From the US by the way ) I appreciate the research and technical analysis found here on Hot Copper. With Toyota, Ford, Volvo etc making recent commitments to build massive battery plants here really is catching a lot of attention.

However in the US there seems to be a common “Theme“ from analysts, hedge funds, and investors regarding EV battery investment. That the Theme or presentation has the same buzz words and chart descriptions. The Magpie QuantumScape “ Short “ post illustrates this. QS used ‘ Faulty “ data , charts and buzz words the laymen would appreciate in the beginning ( including the street ).

It has bought to the front a need to complete due diligence, consult with technical experts, evaluate history of Board/Management, scientists and the like – that will further solidify PPK/LIS/Deakin – QS may have done us a favor – the legitimate companies will stand tall and be easily recognised.

As for Hot Copper, we have Wes to provide an evaluation from a technical standpoint.

My point is this:
We know that PPK / Deakin / LIS / BNNT have the “Holy Grail of battery technology“ However, IMO the way LIS has kept this basically under wraps is a good thing. Because we know LIS has NO intention of “manufacturing“ batteries but rather forming partnerships with the OEMs ( ie Toyota , Panasonic etc. ). An announcement coming from say a Toyota will be much more impactful than from “ another battery tech co." ) IMO these announcements are coming when the engagements are solidified. A work in progress that won’t take long.


https://www.dallasnews.com/business/autos/2021/10/18/toyota-plans-to-build-129-billion-battery-plant-in-us-creating-1750-jobs/