ARU - Till Year end 21, page-46

@ausheds

Absolutely not, It has no bearing at all on the outlined CAPEX and OPEX. Are you suggesting our board is now fraudulent as well? So saying although they have noted these values they are negligent in not including these values in the modelling, so misrepresenting the entire project???

If this is the case (which it is not), then they will have to answer, but, if I was you, I would be very careful who you are defaming, there is a case building against you for false misrepresentations. Call it emotive all you like, but while you misrepresent ARU in suggesting they have not been factored into existing plans you open yourself up in so many ways...remember the share price has increased from 6c to 22c... that is a lot of money you are placing on your false misrepresentations there...and we have tracked your posts Tim. Your history is available publicly.

Further, contrary to your comments, I consider you yourself emotive - a review of your history will show this, attempting a new angle every week to defame ARU and all other rare earths that you have no investment, further, throwing out derogatory and disparaging comments to anyone that posts on ARU or other rare earth companies outside of HAS. What is the angle tomorrow?

@ipv6ready and @tradeprofits you both can ignore what you like, but taking the moral high ground on us, places you with this guy above. If that is your legacy, so be it, but please do not push your 'IGNORE' policy on us. This leads to the unsuspecting making poor decisions, and that in my view is unfair.