Hey Mike
thanks. A few reasons why I have put a bit into CHM money wise (which am happy to lose)
* I like the David versus Goliath situations when I think there is a balanced argument with debateable outcomes...like CAZ vs RIO (i lost a packet on that outcome even though CAZ was legally in the right...the WA premier over-rode the law to give RIO the tenement)
* I do believe Grimaldi did wrong in this situations and going to court now this could be corrected
* I think CHM have a good case and a good team with a fair to good chance of winning in court
* If the funder doesn'r end up with 100% of the money if they win, CHM may end up with some ok money and get on with exploring something of value
I've got nothing against MMX...I reckon they are a stella company going places in a big way....I just think CHM got a bit of a raw deal and faced extinction if things wern't corrected and this now being in court, I think there is a chance CHM might be thrown some justice.
It will all be over in a few weeks...the case anyway...then the judgement financially will be handed down 2-4 weeks after the case ends.
Either way its all good and we shouldn't get too worked up over it.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MMX
- worst case scenario
worst case scenario, page-66
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 54 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MMX (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online