y dont growers by the land?, page-3

In put by investors with IWC is a good start ,nobody has total control or the magic bullet to resolving this,except this that now carbon credits,value adding the plantations apart from the so called stump and chip.I read an article that Origin Energy were prepared to buy $24mil of land and plant to off set co2.

The messsage that I am putting there is owning the land,we own the trees,remember it wont get cheaper as anecdotal statements in local papers in the green triangle the graziers were touting $3000 an acre,not hectare to put back to food production.
But in the case of the IWC,it is a co-operative and I have a tangiable asset and not some scrap of paper that some crettin says we can change the rules when we like in Perth.
I need to point out if the plantations are so important to PPPl,why have their meetings in Perth,instead of where the majority of investors are in the Eastern seaboard.