for the record Joe, I’m pretty sure JK’s salary in the years in question was only about $250k per annum, so you can put 75% on that if you want to, it doesn’t add up to the much (no mental gymnastics needed there). The whole 75% threshold is random and decided by the ATO. I think there is every chance a logical judge, even deciding in the ATO’s favour, will think a doubling of the guys tax bill on penalties is excessive (as would most independent people). I’m pretty sure he’ll be able to get that down.....
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?