Same old data year after year. Something smells about this company. Why did they sell assets instead of capital raising like everyone else? Maybe because the biggest shareholder didn’t want to have to spend money to keep its % share of the company? What does that say about the prospects for FRM? How is it legal that the biggest shareholder plus 1 or 2 directors have the majority of shares and so effectively control the company? The remaining shareholders are just along for the ride!
Ann: Results of Meeting, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
